# Teleological Blog > "Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved." -- Francis Crick ## Posts - [Light Doesn't Travel](https://teleological.org/index.php/2026/01/09/light-doesnt-travel/): This is the reason why Feynman is considered a giant in physics and quantum mechanics This video reminded me of the Danish astronomer Ole Rømer in 1676 had disproved Jason Lisle’s deceptive Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) way back in 1676. But a real astrophysicist with a PhD would know this. I don’t want to beat a dead horse since I’ve already gone over this in Why I Am Not A Young Earth Creationist anymore and Dissecting YEC – Science and Light (Part 4), but Rømer’s experiment was so much simpler. Rømer’s experiment disproves Lisle’s deceptive idea that incoming light is… - [Penrose and Fuentes on Gravity and QM](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/11/25/penrose-and-fuentes-on-gravity-and-qm/): Two renowned theoretical physicists collaborate to analyze an experiment and what that means for quantum mechanics and gravity. I have not posted very much on quantum mechanics on this website, mostly because I don’t understand it or at least accept the current interpretation of the understanding of it. I don’t understand/accept the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. At the core I think it is a measurement problem and not an ontological incoherence. But then again, maybe I am just a dumb layman who is just not smart enough to see the King is adorned with a beautiful garment rather than… - [YEC Lisle's Ignorance on QM](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/11/10/yec-lisles-ignorance-on-qm/): This is why YEC should just stick to their erroneous interpretation of the Bible and don’t get confused by science. Why do they feel the need to be concordists. At the end of the day if they see something in science that they don’t think agrees with their young earth view, they would automatically reject it anyway. So, I wish YEC would just stay out of science and not exhibit their ignorance. It doesn’t just make them look bad but the rest of us Christians gets lumped in with them and make the job of evangelism more difficult. In this… - [YEC Lisle’s Incoherent Science](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/11/05/yec-lisles-incoherent-science/): I tried to give Jason Lisle the benefit of the doubt when he was boasting about this young earth creation prediction for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). But I have to conclude that he is just lying or at the very least he has convinced himself of that lie. I say this based on a YouTube video of him speaking to a church audience and his 2024 article in ARJ. ARJ is just a young earth creationist website sponsored by Answers in Genesis to promote young earth views. About 21 minutes into this video he is once again bragging… - [JWST Reveals Jason Lisle Prediction is Wrong](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/11/01/jwst-reveals-jason-lisle-prediction-is-wrong/): I was hoping I didn’t have to do this, but I came across this video and I just couldn’t let it go. I had tried to give Jason Lisle the benefit of the doubt when he was boasting about this young earth creation prediction for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). But I have to conclude that he is just lying or at the very least he has convinced himself of that lie. I say this based on a YouTube video of him speaking to a church audience and his 2024 article in ARJ. ARJ is just a young earth… - [Dissecting YEC - Death Above All (Part 5)](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/10/23/dissecting-yec-part-5/): I’ve come to the final installment of this series on Genesis 1-2. In the previous posts I’ve highlighted the YEC bias. I have shown from the Bible how they have distorted the text to support their global flood indoctrination. Then, I shown from the Bible how they have misinterpreted the creation days in Genesis and how YEC embarrass themselves but distorting science to support their errors. Because of their pride and arrogance, they are unable to accept their distortion of the Bible and science earning unbeliever’s ridicule. Finally, I have come to my last critique of the YEC delusion on… - [Noah Curse Canaan](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/10/20/noah-curse-canaan/): Let’s take a break from the YEC delusion, even though I am on the opposite side with the YEC on this too. What else is new. 😂 Genesis 9:25 (ESV) “he said, “Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brothers.” The problem with this curse by Noah is that he is cursing someone who did not commit the sin. Whatever Ham did, it was Ham who sinned, Canaan was innocent of any wrongdoing. It does not seem just or fair to curse the son for the sin of the father. Let’s get one thing straight… - [Dissecting YEC - Science and Light (Part 4)](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/10/18/dissecting-yec-part-4/): In my last post I laid out the case based on the Bible alone why the young earth creationists are wrong, Genesis 1-2 cannot be 24-hr days. I’ve also shown how YEC have elevated themselves and their biases to be the orthodoxy that everyone must be measured by. We can pray for them but I don’t think they will ever change. They are like some of the early Church Fathers who clings to a flat earth because they claim to have the only correct interpretation of the Bible. Lactantius (c. 250–325 CE) is the most direct example of a Church… - [Dissecting YEC - How Long (Part 3)](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/10/17/dissecting-yec-part-3/): What is the age of the earth and God’s entire creation? If you have been reading these posts, you would be blind if you don’t see the YEC refrain that it all comes down to reading the Text plainly. The only reason you don’t see Gensis 1 is describing a 24-hr day, is because you are taking external science and forcing it onto the plain reading of the Text. Honestly, I think there is a lot of appeal to this line of argument by the YEC. As Christians we know we have been persecuted throughout history. Even today we are… - [Dissecting YEC - Flood: Global or Local(Part 2)](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/10/14/dissecting-yec-part-2/): Flood Theology Was the flood global or local? As a Christian we need to look at this theologically first and foremost. We then should examine if our understanding reflect reality because God is not the God of confusion. 1 Corinthians 14:33 (NASB95) “for God is not a God of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints.” God’s Word is infallible but we are not, especially YEC. So, let’s look at the flood account. Genesis 71 The Lord then said to Noah, “Go into the ark, you and your whole family, because I have found you… - [Dissecting YEC - Where is the Divide (Part 1)](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/10/13/dissecting-yec-part-1/): Let’s make one thing perfectly clear right from the start, unless YEC want to established themselves as the new Catholic church with Ken Ham as their Pope, take everything they say as just their opinions. I say this not to be derisive but as a statement of fact. Almost universally the recent YEC will claim they are the only ones who uphold the truth of the Bible and the sole people who knows what the Bible says especially in Genesis 1-11. They don’t even say they are interpreting Genesis. In their mind what they say is actually what the Bible… - [Young Earth Creationists Bias](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/09/24/young-earth-creationists-bias/): and dare I say duplicity. Here is a debate between Hugh Ross & Eric Hovind on the Age of the Earth. Here is the article on Eric Hovind’s website on The Hebrew Yom: Taking One Day at a Time. Go ahead and watch that debate but my post here is focused on Hovind’s own article. Day in Context The Hebrew yom occurs 2,282 times outside Genesis 1. It occurs 359 times with a number outside Genesis 1. Some of these occurrences use cardinal numbers (one, two, three, etc.) and some use ordinal numbers (first, second, third, etc.). However, in all… - [Why I Am Not A Young Earth Creationist anymore](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/09/23/why-i-am-not-a-young-earth-creationist-anymore/): Yes, I used to be a Young Earth Creationist (YEC) but these days they like to call themselves Biblical Creationist, whatever that means. OK, I know what it means but I don’t want to waste my time in this post to dissect their stupid name change as if that would help them with their underlying flawed theology and science. I stumbled on this This is an idea that YEC like Jason Lisle have espouse for some time. This is the reason why I am no longer a YEC. I used to think “secular” scientists misuse the data from science to… - [YEC Error](https://teleological.org/index.php/2025/09/14/yec-error/): Is Genesis 1 Literal, Literalism, or Literalistic? Young Earth Creationists like to claim they are the only Christians who hold the truth of the Bible. And they claim that science support their interpretation of of the Bible. Everyone else has capitulated to the atheistic evolutionary science and conform their interpretation to match the false secular science. I don’t think I am too far off in stating the YEC view on this since I’ve been the subject of many of their attacks based on my Old Earth Creationist view. So I will use the above article from Answers In Genesis, a… - [Darwinian Fizzbin (The Third Revolution)](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/23/darwinian-fizzbin-the-third-revolution/): Evo-Devo, evolutionary developmental biology, this is the third revolution that biologist Sean Carroll says will explain how new forms most beautiful can be created by the god of materialism. The first revolution came when Charles Darwin published his seminal book on evolution, “The Origin of Species.” Darwin explained how, over eons, living organisms became diverse through a process called natural selection, meaning that nature decided which species had best adapted to their environment, and thus would thrive. The second revolution came with the merging of Darwin’s theories and the science of genetics. But neither of those approaches revealed how individual… - [Darwinian Fizzbin (Second Revolution)](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/23/darwinian-fizzbin-second-revolution/): The second revolution came with the merging of Darwin’s theories and the science of genetics. In the first revolution, Darwin tells us that the origin of species, the diversity of all life on earth came from some warm little pond. This was possible because of natural selection. It was quickly discovered that natural selection (the fittest survive) could not have created all the new forms of life. At best it only acted on existing forms of life. No one knew what natural selection was acting on. Is this a problem for natural selection? No, not in Darwinian Fizzbin. Darwinists are… - [How To Grow A Homo Sapien](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/22/how-to-grow-a-homo-sapien/):   + ≡   +    ≡   The latest Darwinian rage is the newly sequenced Sea Urchin genome, which shows a surprising relationship to humans. I don’t know how much similarity we are suppose to have with the sea urchins, but I thought we would review what does past sequenced similarity mean. The two examples above show what it means to be human. If we combine rice genome (approximately 30% human) with a C. elegans (approximately 70% human), would we get Einstein? Or if we combine a mouse (approximately 80% human), with a daffodil (approximately 20% human), we would get… - [Darwinian Failure Imposed On ID](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/22/darwinian-failure-imposed-on-id/): I like to summarize the points that I’ve made in a debate over at telicthoughts. ID theory is certainly different than Darwinism. Darwinism claims that it has a successful explanatory process for biodiversity. It does not. No matter how many times Darwinists repeat the mantra that small changes will accumulate to major biodiversity. It doesn’t make it real. There are no observable macroevolutionary changes through natural processes. Why is it unreasonable to demand a videotape of the historical macroevolution, when Darwinists can demand ID to produce a designer? Besides Darwinism not only fails at producing such a videotape of the… - [Is Darwinism Science?](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/22/is-darwinism-science/): Darwinian evolutionist have been very successful in deceiving the world that Darwinian evolution is science. When in fact the majority of Darwinists are Atheists with an atheistic agenda. It has become a religion with high priests and priestesses. No one is allowed to challenge their material naturalistic beliefs. In a statement on evolution from their book Miller and Levine writes, What does Evolution Teach About a Creator? Nothing. Evolution is a scientific theory and, like other scientific theories, has nothing to say about spiritual matters. Oh if only that is true. Atheistic evolutionists are hiding under the guise of science… - [Darwinian Fizzbin](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/21/108/): Bluffing, confusion, obfuscation and equivocation applies both to Fizzbin the card game in Star Trek and to Darwinism. In the original Star Trek series episode “A Piece of the Action”, Kirk asked the thugs of an alien planet organized as different groups of mobs if they are smart enough to learn a new card game called Fizzbin. The rules of the game are extremely confusing because Kirk was making up the rules as he goes along. Darwinism operates in like manner. Darwinists would like you to think that unless you have a PhD in biology (in reality it doesn’t matter… - [Atheist Manifesto](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/21/atheist-manifesto/): For it is with your heart that you believe, and it is with your mouth that you confess you are atheist. As Darwin says, “Anyone who trusts in methodological naturalism will never be put to shame.”, because there is no morality. For there is big difference between Jew and Gentile the same Lord of Evolution has made some over the others. “Everyone who calls on the name of Atheism will be nihilist.” How, then, can they call on the one they have not believed in? And how can they believe unless they be brainwash by other Atheist. And how can… - [Molecular Convergence Evidence Against Darwinian Evolution](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/21/molecular-convergence-evidence-against-darwinian-evolution/): According to Darwinian evolution, which is a unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection. Evolution should not repeat itself, in other words you can’t replay the tape of life. Yet the observable evidence from nature contradicts this Darwinian thesis. Similar and unrelated forms are replete in nature. Is an “unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection” a better explanation for this observation or is this the product of reuse by intelligent design? Some Darwinians have tried to explain this common design as analogous forms in morphology; there are no real common design at the molecular level.… - [Hello world!](https://teleological.org/index.php/2024/01/21/hello-world/): Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing! ## Pages - [Reset Password](https://teleological.org/index.php/reset-password/) - [Lost Password](https://teleological.org/index.php/lost-password/) - [My Account](https://teleological.org/index.php/my-account/) - [Login](https://teleological.org/index.php/login-2/) - [Registration](https://teleological.org/index.php/registration/) - [Users List Item](https://teleological.org/index.php/user-list-item/): [uwp_users_item] - [Users](https://teleological.org/index.php/users/): [uwp_users] - [Profile](https://teleological.org/index.php/profile/): [uwp_profile] - [Change Password](https://teleological.org/index.php/change/): [uwp_change] - [Reset Password](https://teleological.org/index.php/reset/): [uwp_reset] - [Forgot Password?](https://teleological.org/index.php/forgot/): [uwp_forgot] - [Account](https://teleological.org/index.php/account/): [uwp_account] - [Login](https://teleological.org/index.php/login/): [uwp_login] - [Register](https://teleological.org/index.php/register/): [uwp_register] - [Convergent Evolution](https://teleological.org/index.php/convergent-evolution/): Convergent Evolution Essentially I have two arguments against convergent evolution. 1.      Darwinian evolution has no scientific basis for convergent evolution. 2.      Empirical and real life observation refutes Darwinism as a possible explanation for analogous traits in diverse organisms. Darwinists claim that convergence of functional, morphological and structural traits from phylogenetically unrelated species are a result of random mutation directed by similar environment and selection pressures. This would mean that environmental and selection pressure is a greater driving force for how a species is to evolve than random mutation. From a Darwinian point of view the diversity of life is achieved… - [Darwinist Bias](https://teleological.org/index.php/darwinist-bias/): The Intelligent Design (ID) critics are so blinded by their anti-ID worldview they refuse to understand what ID means, leaving them to criticize from ignorance. They are left with rhetorical attacks and misrepresentation of what the design theory is. The plain definition for ID is no harder to understand than the definition for The Theory of Evolution (ToE). For comparison purpose I will describe the definition for ToE and ID. ToE says that all the diversity of life on Earth comes from an abiogenesis process and sharing one or few common ancestors. From this common ancestor through RM&NS, all the… - [Atheism’s Trojan Horse](https://teleological.org/index.php/sample-page/): Part 1 In the latest episode of Darwinist obfuscation, Dr Provine is pulling out the Darwinist playbook as prescribed by Elsberry here. The other approach is to show that religion underlies “intelligent design”. In 2002, I gave a talk on evolution and “intelligent design” at the CSICOP Fourth World Skeptics Conference. In that one, I did show how the “intelligent design” movement was run by religious people for religious purposes. And that’s the approach of Creationism’s Trojan Horse from Press. Why is this tactic important to the Darwinists? Maybe it is because they know that the general public is skeptical… [comment]: # (Generated by Hostinger Tools Plugin)