Traveling to the Island of Patmos : Just to get Revelation and Preterism Wrong

“him who beheld the apocalyptic vision. For that was seen no very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian’s reign.” (Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.30.3)

According to Joel Richardson in this video the fact that he traveled to Patmos somehow allowed him to settled the debate that Preterism is wrong. A conclusion that he already had before his travel to Patmos along with his confirmation bias.

Let’s look at the key piece of evidence that he is using without the need to travel to Patmos.

Aliens, UAP and Idiocracy

We have finally reached the point of Idiocracy. This shouldn’t be possible but we are here. The supposed smart high I.Q. people are idiots.

Dan Farah is the Director and Producer of The Age of Disclosure, a landmark documentary. Said,

There has been an 80-year cover up of the existence of non-human intelligent life covered up by elements of the US government.

UAP Government Cover-up or Nones Pipe Dream

The government has begun releasing video footages of UAP, unidentified anomalous phenomenon. This has generated a lot of excitement in the secular and UFO community that the government has finally acknowledge that UAP exists and by that also implicitly admit that aliens exists and they have been on Earth for a long time.

So, what do we know so far? All known UAP have been small blobs of light that moves in irregular or directions that is beyond our known capabilities. We also have testimonies from pilots and people who are close to projects that is claim to be connected to UAP. The documentary film The Age of Disclosure is supposed to have exposed the truth behind UAP. Then you have the likes of retired Navy Admiral Timothy Gallaudet who know aliens exist and they are here on Earth. When Will Cain asked him do you have any hard evidence of aliens such as physical or biological materials. He then said I have not seen it personally but other people like David Grusch has “testified” in 2024 about having knowledge of programs that keep that material classified and secured. He thinks there are non-human intelligence at a higher order than us operating these crafts.

Light Doesn’t Travel

This is the reason why Feynman is considered a giant in physics and quantum mechanics

This video reminded me of the Danish astronomer Ole Rømer in 1676 had disproved Jason Lisle’s deceptive Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) way back in 1676.

Penrose and Fuentes on Gravity and QM

Two renowned theoretical physicists collaborate to analyze an experiment and what that means for quantum mechanics and gravity. I have not posted very much on quantum mechanics on this website, mostly because I don’t understand it or at least accept the current interpretation of the understanding of it. I don’t understand/accept the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. At the core I think it is a measurement problem and not an ontological incoherence. But then again, maybe I am just a dumb layman who is just not smart enough to see the King is adorned with a beautiful garment rather than having no clothes.

Penrose had been a longtime skeptic of QM so this interview was fascinating. I’ve included the link to the paper they are referencing below.

Observation of the quantum equivalence principle for matter-waves

YEC Lisle’s Ignorance on QM


This is why YEC should just stick to their erroneous interpretation of the Bible and don’t get confused by science. Why do they feel the need to be concordists. At the end of the day if they see something in science that they don’t think agrees with their young earth view, they would automatically reject it anyway. So, I wish YEC would just stay out of science and not exhibit their ignorance. It doesn’t just make them look bad but the rest of us Christians gets lumped in with them and make the job of evangelism more difficult.

YEC Lisle’s Incoherent Science

I tried to give Jason Lisle the benefit of the doubt when he was boasting about this young earth creation prediction for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). But I have to conclude that he is just lying or at the very least he has convinced himself of that lie. I say this based on a YouTube video of him speaking to a church audience and his 2024 article in ARJ. ARJ is just a young earth creationist website sponsored by Answers in Genesis to promote young earth views. About 21 minutes into this video he is once again bragging about his young earth unscientifically based prediction (his words not mine), about what JWST will find. And ridiculing secular scientists with strawman arguments and misrepresentations.

I pointed out Lisle’s wildly false prediction regarding JWST’s data in my last post. Emboldened by his propaganda tour to churches for his misrepresentation of JWST’s data, he decided to put some science behind his claim. He probably felt he needed to do this because by his own admission, his prediction is a god of the gap prediction. Or more accurately Lisle of the gap prediction. The prediction is based entirely on his misinterpretation of the Bible and no basis on science. As a result, he probably felt that he need to put some reality into his imagination. So, in 2024 he wrote this article Sizes of Galaxies in JWST Data Suggest New Cosmology on the ARJ website. Christian theoretical astrophysicist Luke Barnes[1] has posted a critique of Lisle (2024) on ARJ.

JWST Reveals Jason Lisle Prediction is Wrong

I was hoping I didn’t have to do this, but I came across this video and I just couldn’t let it go. I had tried to give Jason Lisle the benefit of the doubt when he was boasting about this young earth creation prediction for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). But I have to conclude that he is just lying or at the very least he has convinced himself of that lie. I say this based on a YouTube video of him speaking to a church audience and his 2024 article in ARJ. ARJ is just a young earth creationist website sponsored by Answers in Genesis to promote young earth views. So, in this video he is once again boasting about this young earth prediction about what JWST will find. And ridiculing secular scientist with strawman arguments and misrepresentations.

Dissecting YEC – Death Above All (Part 5)

I’ve come to the final installment of this series on Genesis 1-2. In the previous posts I’ve highlighted the YEC bias. I have shown from the Bible how they have distorted the text to support their global flood indoctrination. Then, I shown from the Bible how they have misinterpreted the creation days in Genesis and how YEC embarrass themselves but distorting science to support their errors. Because of their pride and arrogance, they are unable to accept their distortion of the Bible and science earning unbeliever’s ridicule. Finally, I have come to my last critique of the YEC delusion on their addition to the Bible of no death of any kind before the fall of Adam and Eve.

In my post Dissecting YEC (Part 2) I’ve compared the difference between the YEC and OEC on Genesis creation days. I want to reference back to that table. YEC argument goes like this. There can’t be death of any kind before the fall of Adam and Eve because death is a result of sin. Therefore, before there was sin how can you have death. In a stunning and rare admission by Ken Ham.

Unlike the case of Romans 5:12, there is no verse of Scripture that specifically teaches that there was no animal death before sin.

And this,