Posted inaliens atheism Physics

Disclosure Day : There Are No Aliens

In Steven Spielberg’s latest movie Disclosure Day is the not so subtle subversive message that if aliens are here on Earth, people and Christians in particular would stop believing in God. That is a ridicules assumption that I am not going to argue in this post, but it is extremely illuminating on the atheist’s psyche of why their obsession with SETI and trying to find extraterrestrial life. In their mind extraterrestrial life in any form, is their holy grail to disproving God.

Hence the latest craze to push the government to acknowledge there are aliens on Earth and they have been hiding the evidence from us. The government is covering up alien bodies and technologies. They have created this circular reasoning, the government is hiding the evidence, if the government don’t release the evidence then we know they are engaged in a cover-up.

Posted inatheism bias id

Darwinian Failure Imposed On ID

I like to summarize the points that I've made in a debate over at telicthoughts. ID theory is certainly different than Darwinism. Darwinism claims that it has a successful explanatory…
Posted indarwinism

Is Darwinism Science?

Darwinian evolutionist have been very successful in deceiving the world that Darwinian evolution is science. When in fact the majority of Darwinists are Atheists with an atheistic agenda. It has…
Posted inatheism bias darwinism

Darwinian Fizzbin

Bluffing, confusion, obfuscation and equivocation applies both to Fizzbin the card game in Star Trek and to Darwinism. In the original Star Trek series episode "A Piece of the Action",…
Posted inatheism bias darwinism

Molecular Convergence Evidence Against Darwinian Evolution

According to Darwinian evolution, which is a unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection. Evolution should not repeat itself, in other words you can’t replay the tape of life. Yet the observable evidence from nature contradicts this Darwinian thesis. Similar and unrelated forms are replete in nature. Is an “unguided, unplanned process of random variation and natural selection” a better explanation for this observation or is this the product of reuse by intelligent design?

Some Darwinians have tried to explain this common design as analogous forms in morphology; there are no real common design at the molecular level. In this essay are examples of molecular common design. For this post I would like to expound on one of the examples in the essay, “Convergent evolution in primates and an insectivore”. Before I begin let me include a couple of more related articles here and here.

The essay quotes from a study that shows the independent evolution (convergence) of the protein apolipoprotein(a). Apo(a) and apoB-100 are disulfide-linked forming the main constituents of lipoprotein(a) (lp(a)). This protein is only found in limited species of mammals, the primates and insectivore. [old world monkey (like the baboon), apes, humans and hedgehogs] Interestingly the hedgehog is considered to be our most distant mammalian relative. Our alleged ancestors have diverged about 90 mya.